After the President's Inaugural Address, the presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin was asked if it met the standard set by prior addresses; her reply was that it met it in spirit if not in substance.
Do you agree?
And here are some leads re the address~~
VOXXI - 57 minutes ago - 14232 related articles »
The Courier-Journal - 5 hours ago - 6309 related articles »
The Associated Press - 2 hours ago
David A. Fahrenthold and Debbi Wilgoren
1:15 PM ET
Inaugural festivities offer nation
chance to take stock and contemplate promise and peril of next four years.Chris Cillizza 1:18 PM ET
THE FIX | Why his speech could only be given by someone who is not running for reelection again .
Chris Cillizza (from the Fix) articulated my reaction to the speech pretty well. I thought Obama sounded fierce and ready.
ReplyDeleteI thought it was a brilliant speech. It employed the the familiar tropes of American exceptionalism to convey the very specific policies he alluded to - even down to the "quiet lanes of Newtown" reference at the end. That Obama, he's a clever devil, he is.
ReplyDelete